The law is for all drivers

荣格

新客户展示位
更多广告请点击
中文黄页

有您的支持
我们会做得更好

Someone needs to explain the difference between a right and a privilege to members of the Canadian Sikh Association.
( B3 F8 A, X/ p! V  xDuring a recent meeting in Mississauga, members of the association revealed they intend to push Queen’s Park to introduce new regulations allowing turban-wearing motorcyclists to ride their bikes without wearing a helmet, as the law now requires.
They are presenting their case as a human rights issue.
9 }8 c  c( a# q6 b' w1 U“Safety is not an issue. It’s the issue(s) of equality, fairness and freedom of religion,” said Manohar Singh Bal, director of the organization.
. y3 r6 i: {$ a4 ]3 u2 T) A! e+ mWith all due respect to Mr. Bal, this is in no way a question of human rights.
And safety most certainly is at issue.
In Ontario, the law requires all motorcycle drivers to wear a helmet. That law, like all laws, must be applied fairly and equally across the board to all segments of our population.
: O9 ?) A/ G- u. E( M8 vOne of our readers summed up the situation best when he pointed out that: “There are no religions in the world which require a person to ride a motorcycle as a part of their faith, belief system or method of worship. Riding a motorcycle is neither a human right, a religious right nor a Charter right; it is a licensed privilege.”
: _6 ^- l* k6 I/ V, c2 N6 u9 |! V, LAnother of our readers asks if Sikhs who sustain head injuries in a crash will pay for their own medical care? Or, do they consider universal healthcare to be another inalienable human right?
8 }& O- Q! t8 [/ P: f: c: A% PFinally, the last word goes to yet another reader, who writes: No helmet + no insurance = buy a car.